Published version, redistributed under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Original: https://doi.org/10.1017/S026021051600005X
After the 'CNN effect' concept was coined two decades ago, it quickly became a popular shorthand to understand media-conflict interactions. Although the connection has probably always been more complex than what was captured in the concept, research needs to be updated in order to better understand the multifaceted contemporary environments of both media and conflict. There are growing numbers and types of media sources, and multiple interactions between media and conflict actors, policymakers and engaged publics from the local to the global and back. We argue that understanding the impact of media reporting on conflict requires a new framework that captures the multilevel and hybrid media environments of contemporary conflicts. This study provides a roadmap of how to systematically unpack this environment. It describes and explains how different levels, interactions, and forms of news reporting shape conflicts and peacebuilding in local, national and regional contexts, and how international responses interact with multiple media narratives. With these tools, comprehensive understandings of contemporary local to global media interactions can be incorporated into new research on media and conflict.
Download the full text (PDF)
Key Messages
Topics
Access
This article is published open access under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. The version of record is free to read at Cambridge University Press. An earlier working-paper version is on SSRN.
Citation
Gilboa, Eytan, Maria Gabrielsen Jumbert, Jason Miklian and Piers Robinson.
"Moving media and conflict studies beyond the CNN effect." Review of International Studies 42(4), 2016, pp. 654–672.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S026021051600005X
https://doi.org/10.1017/S026021051600005X