<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Jason Miklian, New Research</title>
  <subtitle>New publications, working papers, and concepts from Jason Miklian, Senior Researcher at the University of Oslo. Business and peace, polycrisis, fragile states, AI governance.</subtitle>
  <link href="https://miklian.org/feed.xml" rel="self"/>
  <link href="https://miklian.org/"/>
  <id>https://miklian.org/</id>
  <updated>2026-04-14T00:00:00Z</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Jason Miklian</name>
    <uri>https://miklian.org/</uri>
    <email>jason.miklian@globe.uio.no</email>
  </author>
  <rights>Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)</rights>

  <entry>
    <title>Right Diagnosis, Wrong Prescriptions? Testing Ten of Karl Marx's Hypotheses Against Twenty-First-Century Data</title>
    <link href="https://miklian.org/papers/right-diagnosis-wrong-prescriptions-testing-marx-hypotheses-21st-century-data"/>
    <id>https://miklian.org/papers/right-diagnosis-wrong-prescriptions-testing-marx-hypotheses-21st-century-data</id>
    <updated>2026-04-14T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-04-14T00:00:00Z</published>
    <category term="Political Economy"/>
    <category term="Marxism"/>
    <category term="Inequality"/>
    <summary>Ten Marxist hypotheses tested on 21st-century panel data covering 183 countries. Economic diagnostics hold up strongly (mean .516); political predictions score far weaker (.300). Institutional design, not historical inevitability, mediates whether economic exploitation produces political consequences.</summary>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <title>A Problem of the Present: What Artificial Intelligence Tools Can (and Can't) Deliver for Business Under Crisis and Political Instability</title>
    <link href="https://miklian.org/papers/problem-of-the-present-ai-tools-business-crisis-political-instability"/>
    <id>https://miklian.org/papers/problem-of-the-present-ai-tools-business-crisis-political-instability</id>
    <updated>2026-04-14T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-04-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <category term="AI Governance"/>
    <category term="Polycrisis"/>
    <category term="Stakeholder Theory"/>
    <summary>AI tools synthesize the recent past and extrapolate probabilistic futures, but struggle with three epistemic demands instability places on decision-makers. Algorithmic mediation renders the most consequential stakeholders structurally undetectable. Local knowledge networks function as an insurance policy against catastrophic misreading at a fraction of the cost of algorithmic failure.</summary>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <title>What is an Academic Article For? The Production of Scholarly Work and its Meaning in an Agentic AI World</title>
    <link href="https://miklian.org/papers/what-is-an-academic-article-for-scholarly-work-agentic-ai"/>
    <id>https://miklian.org/papers/what-is-an-academic-article-for-scholarly-work-agentic-ai</id>
    <updated>2026-04-04T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-03-15T00:00:00Z</published>
    <category term="AI Governance"/>
    <category term="Methodology"/>
    <summary>Seven-part typology of scholarly activities mapped against AI capability, with empirical analysis of 2,750 articles showing AI linguistic markers doubling across social science journals.</summary>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <title>Digital Governance in Hybrid Regimes: How Global Social Media Platforms Navigate the Space Between Democracy and Authoritarianism</title>
    <link href="https://miklian.org/papers/digital-governance-in-hybrid-regimes-social-media-platforms-democracy-authoritarianism"/>
    <id>https://miklian.org/papers/digital-governance-in-hybrid-regimes-social-media-platforms-democracy-authoritarianism</id>
    <updated>2026-03-01T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-03-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <category term="AI Governance"/>
    <category term="Hybrid Regimes"/>
    <summary>Develops a "worst of both worlds" framework showing how hybrid regimes deploy authoritarian digital control through formally democratic legal mechanisms.</summary>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <title>A New Digital Divide? Coder Worldviews, the 'Slop Economy,' and Democracy in the Age of AI</title>
    <link href="https://miklian.org/papers/a-new-digital-divide-coder-worldviews-the-slop-economy-and-democracy-in-the-age"/>
    <id>https://miklian.org/papers/a-new-digital-divide-coder-worldviews-the-slop-economy-and-democracy-in-the-age</id>
    <updated>2026-02-15T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-02-15T00:00:00Z</published>
    <category term="AI Governance"/>
    <category term="Slop Economy"/>
    <summary>Introduces the slop economy and coder worldviews as analytical concepts for the political economy of AI in the Global South.</summary>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <title>Business Survival Strategies in a Polycrisis: SME Experiences from Beirut, Lebanon</title>
    <link href="https://miklian.org/papers/business-survival-strategies-in-a-polycrisis-sme-experiences-from-beirut-lebanon"/>
    <id>https://miklian.org/papers/business-survival-strategies-in-a-polycrisis-sme-experiences-from-beirut-lebanon</id>
    <updated>2025-09-01T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2025-09-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <category term="Polycrisis"/>
    <category term="SMEs"/>
    <summary>Beirut SMEs surviving polycrisis employed four distinctive strategies: hyper-localization, rapid revenue diversification, fierce team protection, and active community partnerships.</summary>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <title>Unlocking the Peace Premium: An Evidence-Based Review of the Potentials and Pitfalls of Private Sector Finance for Peacebuilding</title>
    <link href="https://miklian.org/papers/unlocking-the-peace-premium-an-evidence-based-review-of-the-potentials-and"/>
    <id>https://miklian.org/papers/unlocking-the-peace-premium-an-evidence-based-review-of-the-potentials-and</id>
    <updated>2025-06-01T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2025-06-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <category term="Business and Peace"/>
    <category term="Peace Premium"/>
    <summary>Defines and operationalizes the peace premium, the economic returns generated when private sector investment actively contributes to conflict transformation.</summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
